Chat Board Archives: February, 2000




This page contains all the messages put onto the BSN Stereo Chat Board during February, 2000. They are in chronological order from first to last. To search for specific topics, use the "find" utility on your browser. For a search of the complete archives, please go to the Stereo Chat Board Archives Main Page.




Name: John Preston
From: Arlington, Texas
Time: 2000-02-01 02:17:22
Comments: Beetlefan, you can respect Rhino all you want, but the label does not always include the single versions, mono or otherwise. The following is a partial list of just some of the big blunders Rhino has made: Four Seasons, none of the Four Seasons Rhino product contains the hit single versions of "Little Boy In Grown Up Clothes" or "Ain't That a Shame"; Wilson Pickett, no single version of the 1967 hit "I Found A Love"; Dionne Warwick, no version at all of the Top 16 hit single "You've Lost That Lovin' Feeling"; Shirelles, no version at all of the Top 22 "Welcome Home Baby", and the mono single version of "Baby It's You"; Ray Stevens, no mono or stereo versions of the hit single edits of "Ahab The Arab" and "Santa Claus Is Watching You"; and on and on and on. More than the mono vs stereo thing, my biggest complaint with Rhino is that they do not always include all of the hits, or correct versions. I would gladly accept the mono versions, if that's all I could get, and they are the single versions. I can't remember the last time I bought a Rhino cd, for those reasons. And Rhino doesn't seem to care about us the way they used to. Shoot, I used to get phone calls from Bill Inglot, and others at the label. They used to return our phone calls... but no more. Our input is as non-important as it can be. I still like some of Bill Inglot's work, though. He's a really talented man. We just don't seem to agree all that often on the way some tracks should be released. But then Rhino isn't paying me to make such decisions. So, that's that.

Name: beetlefan
Time: 2000-02-01 02:20:52
Comments: Luke, most of the early stereo mixes were done mostly for the US market. Also, Martin mixed a lot of stereo for the blue LP's but had little or no involvement in the red or blue CD versions. True, he may have sofened his stance a bit in preparing the Past masters CD's. The way I see it, the Anthologies were just for fun, and to satisfy an insatiable thirst for Beatle music. Happily, the original mono masters to all the singles have been commercially released anyway.

Name: Luke Pacholski
Website: LukPac.org
From: Madison, WI
Time: 2000-02-01 08:50:37
Comments: Beetle, re: The early Beatles stereo mixes were *not* done specifically for the US market - that's a very common misconception. In fact, in several cases, the US was using fake stereo while the UK had the true stereo mix. Having said that, Martin has claimed that the stereo mixes of Please Please Me and With The Beatles were not done by him, and not till after he left EMI in 1965. Both are untrue. The stereo version of Please Please Me came out about a month after the mono - the stereo With The Beatles came out the same day as the mono. As for mixing times, the mono and stereo mixes of the Please Please Me LP were done at the *same session*... As for the Red and Blue CDs, while they were not directly put together by Martin, they did have to get his approval before being released.

Name: Luke Pacholski
Website: LukPac.org
From: Madison, WI
Time: 2000-02-01 08:50:14
Comments: Beetle, re: The early Beatles stereo mixes were *not* done specifically for the US market - that's a very common misconception. In fact, in several cases, the US was using fake stereo while the UK had the true stereo mix. Having said that, Martin has claimed that the stereo mixes of Please Please Me and With The Beatles were not done by him, and not till after he left EMI in 1965. Both are untrue. The stereo version of Please Please Me came out about a month after the mono - the stereo With The Beatles came out the same day as the mono. As for mixing times, the mono and stereo mixes of the Please Please Me LP were done at the *same session*... As for the Red and Blue CDs, while they were not directly put together by Martin, they did have to get his approval before being released.

Name: beetlefan
Time: 2000-02-01 12:00:14
Comments: John, Hey, my gripes with Rhino are the same as yours for exactly the kind of reasons you cited here, and I can think of tons of others. What I should have said is that if not for Bill and Co., the spark to get the mono singles out may never have happenned. It does frustrate me that they refuse, even after letters, calls, and e-mails, they refuse to correct the situation. And yes, I used to get personal calls. I respect their RIGHT to do as they wish. We don't have to buy their product. I haven't bought a Rhino CD in months. I was unhappy with the sound of Parts or their "K.C. & The Sunshine Band Anniversary CD".

Wilson Pickett's "I Found A Love" was a hit for wicked Pickett's band, The Falcons & Band in 1961 on Lupine (1003) Records. The 1967 "hit" you site is a re-recording.

Name: Steve Baird
From: Used to be from Virginia
Time: 2000-02-01 12:01:18
Comments: To Jim in Virginia. That sealed record you found was released in the mid 90's. If you look on the back of the jacket, you will see a bar code, indicating it is a modern release. It has little or no collector value. In fact, most of the Beach Boys' albums were re-released on vinyl -- I have a few of them, but not the one you found. If you didn't have to pay too much for it, and you appreciate the fact that modern vinyl releases are often quieter because of improvements in vinyl formulation, I'd go ahead and open and enjoy it.

The label is the black Capitol one with the rainbow of colors around its circumference. Aside from the quieter vinyl, you will find also that meticulous care was given to mastering it results in superior sound (as was the care given to the Beatles vinyl reissues, which blow away just about everything out there that previously existed).

Re all the controversy about bootlegging -- sorry I missed being here, I was in Atlanta for the weekend and just got back last nite (Go Rams!). But beetle, they don't throw you in jail for speeding, they just write you a ticket. They will, however, throw you in jail for shoplifting.


Name: Marty Natchez
From: The Great Lakes
Time: 2000-02-01 12:36:52
Comments: Although there doesn't seem to be many "Save The RHINO" advocates on this site anymore, I respectfully disagree with John Preston's claim that the label never reissued the Four Seasons' 45 version of "Ain't That a Shame."

To my ears, the hit version with Nick Massi's bass-vocal overdubs was issued on Rhino's 1991 CD "Frankie Valli & the Four Seasons: Greatest Hits Vol. 1" (Rhino 70594). It is the MONO mix I remember, although I haven't listened to my original Vee Jay single to make an exact A-B comparison. It definitely isn't the stereo mix, where Massi's vocals are completely missing.

And while we're on the subject of the Seasons catalog, can anyone confirm if the stereo separation of "Sherry" on the original Vee Jay pressings differed from the Philips and subsequently reissued version? I recall reading in an old BSN newsletter that Valli's vocal tracks were mixed differently on the Vee Jay pressings. What do you know, vinyl-philes?


Name: John Preston
From: Arlington, Texas
Time: 2000-02-01 13:20:42
Comments: Beetlefan, while the earlier version of "I Found A Love" charted, the later version made the Top 40. Both have merit, but the remake was a Wilson Pickett solo , and deserved to be included on his greatest hits cd. To add insult to injury, the cd insert called out "I Found A Love-Part 1", which would fool us into thinking that we were getting the 1967 version, when, in fact, it was the Falcon's hit. I spoke to their A & R man, at the time, and he admitted that they made a mistake. But did it get corrected? No! The only Rhino cd that I can recall ever being corrected was the B.J. Thomas Greatest Hits cd (the mono hit version of "Hooked On a Feeling" was substituted for the stereo lp version).

Name: John Preston
From: Arlington, Texas
Time: 2000-02-01 13:32:25
Comments: Sorry, Marty. That version of "Ain't That a Shame" (on the Greatest Hits Vol 1) is 2:34 seconds long. The single hit version is 2:07. To my knowledge, the hit version has never been reissued on any cd, mono or stereo. The single version may be an edit of the longer one, but it's not the same. Curb is another of those owners who clings to his masters like they were a lifejacket. He needs to get with someone who knows what they are doing and remaster the Four Seasons tracks right.

Name: Dave Sampson
Time: 2000-02-01 15:55:44
Comments: well, I know I'm a little late on discussing those 3 recent boots of Cameo/Parkway material-but having just heard them last night I thought I'd throw in my 2 cents(being from Canada of course that isn't worth all that much). Here we go. First off, since I do have the other C/P releases on Park/CamPark/Bow etc. They sound so much better than these new compilations. Refering to the recent BSN Newsletter and the Cooledit pro. editing software-these recent cds are a good example of how NOT to use that program. Many of the songs have that phasy/tinny effect which results when you try to remove too much hiss/surface noise. There are big hits here that have a fair bit of surface noise all the same-which is not the case on the Campark discs. Many of the songs sound also quite muddy-like alot of the Abkco albums did(and I'm willing to bet those are what were used for sources rather than original C/P LPs). On the few stereo cuts(limbo rock/that old black magic, etc.)-which of course did come from original vinyl, you can hear in the quiet beginnings just how over filtered these cuts are. in fact you can tell the beginning of "linbo rock" was taken from a muddy mono source and edited on to the stereo version. Now, it might sound like I'm being hard on these 3 compilations, truth is, there is enough rare stuff on them to make them worth while, but if you really want clean versions of Chubby Checker, Dovels, Dee Dee Sharp, etc. Go with the Bow/Campark/Park CDs, They certainly sound cleaner and more natural to my ears. They're not perfect, but they're the best there is so far. On the whole ethics issue with bootlegs. I'd rather not stoop to buying them-and I do feel bad about the artists/musicians that are missing out on their due share. But i have no sympathy for the record companies who have been gouging us with inflated CD prices for years. Now They're getting scared with the amount of copying that happens on the internet. They'd better start listening to what the customers really want-or the online underground will put them out of business-or at least hurt them a lot. I am so thankful for companies like Sundazed, Eric, Varese, Ace and other such companies who put painstaking effort into all of their releases. Those are the companies I'm proud to support. I only wish there were more of them.

Name: beetlefan
Time: 2000-02-01 17:29:32
Comments: Dave, I use Cool Edit, and I can tell you that the artifacts are a result of overdoing the cleaning. I have a setting that really works for most of my purposes. It is NOT Cool Edit's fault! If you use the program you will see what I mean. You can produce that noise with ANY program if you don't use it carefully.

?Steve, you CAN get thrown in jail for speeding in this state.

Name: Dave Sampson
Time: 2000-02-01 18:58:13
Comments: Beatle: Thanks, but I know all about cooledit and how it can be "overused". I do have it and use It - which is why I said what I said.

Name: G. Cassan
From: Mississauga, Ontario
Time: 2000-02-01 19:27:21
Comments: If your after the two versions of the Fours Seasons song, "Ain't That A Shame " in best quality, then you need to purchase ACE CD's "Ain't That A Shame / Recorded Live On Stage " for the Mono version (with overdubs) and " Edizione D'Oro" for the Stereo version (no overdubs).

Name: beetlefan
Time: 2000-02-02 00:59:38
Comments: Dave Sampson, I may have misunderstood what you meant by "good example of how NOT to use that program". I took it to mean that you were saying that is a BAD program. Noise reduction is often one of the most misused tools in these programs, be it Sound Forge, Cool Edit, whatever.

I'm also at a disadvantage because I have not read the article in BSN. I'm ashamed to say that I let my suscription lapse.

Name: Mike Hartman
From: Vernon Hills, IL
Time: 2000-02-02 11:12:21
Comments: Marty re: can anyone confirm if the stereo separation of "Sherry" on the original Vee Jay pressings differed from the Philips and subsequently reissued version? (Someone on this board or the newsletter said the vocals were double tracked) I found the Vee-Jay stereo LP in a used record store. To my ears it was the exact same mix we hear everywhere. I did not hear any difference.

Name: John Sellards
Website:
From: Beckley, WV
Time: 2000-02-02 13:24:44
Comments: Regarding Sherry, I am not sure about double tracking or anything, but I have the LP in mono, which I presume has the mono 45 mix on it (this happens more often than people would have you think), and it is subtly different - more reverb, as I recall.

Name: Boppin' Brian
Website:
From: So CA.
Time: 2000-02-03 05:08:05
Comments: Boy howdy - youse a busy buncha beavers, postin' away reams of stuff while I ain't been payin' too close attention..! (about 250 entries since the first of the year or so !!!) Could it be winter weather / cabin fever (no such luck here - - - sunny, dry, breezy, 84 o F.) that has folks hibernatin' & gyratin' & compyooter-atin' & disseminatin' detailed discourses on discs ?….

Regarding C/P 3 CD "belated" comments just a few notches below, here's a thought - I bet the over - tweezed / NR-ed sound isn't a factor on the earlier "gray" issues (Bow/Park/Campark, etc.) as the technology wasn't as widely available just a few years back when those earlier CDs came out. Only have heard the Bow "Limbo Rock" Chubby CD, out of all of them, & I don't claim to be any great expert, but it sounded terrific & not too over-tweezed/NR-ed or otherwise edited. In fact an all - Chubby "site" chose this & another Bow label issue as the very best - sounding of all the dozens of Chubby CDs they covered. Lotsa stereo, too. Chubby checklist….go to:
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~facerg/chubby.htm

A follow - up to the "…..big blunders RHINO has made:…" as posted by John P:…"……..Shirelles, no version at all of the Top 22 "Welcome Home Baby", and the mono single version of "Baby It's You".." Bet you meant they issued mono version (it is on Rhino's "Very Best of…") when it's stereo elsewhere (Ace 356, for one) for the former. As for the latter of the two, could it be that the stereo version (that I prefer & that crops up rarely -- it's on a Laserlight compilation, "Love Songs", #12 320) is one of those pesky "stereo underdubs" ?

Martin T B.'s post on "WHITE CHRISTMAS" caught my attention……..:
"To Tom Daly, thank you for sharing your useful information on "White Christmas". It seems the soundtrack version is not available on CD. I guess I will have to dub the original version to disc from my copy of the 'Holiday Inn' video. The cut on the Bing Crosby box set is not the original version but a 1942 studio recording. It is not an underdub (i.e. missing Majorie Reynold's voice) since the take/recording is different."
Here I thought I had this one covered when grabbing the recent 2 CD MCA "Voice of Christmas.." set just over a year ago. Seems to me that the liner notes claimed to have the original hit 78 single release version, plus its flip, for the first time ever since its original issue…. or words to that effect…..

Agree with DS assessment that
"…."PLEASE MR. POSTMAN" … the stereo version to my ears is a different recording…..".
The giveaway for comparison is on the end - when you don't hear the West Indian (?!) - patois ( "..deliver de letter, de sooner de better") ad-lib (with extra echo effect for emphasis), you can be sure you are hearing the alternate (vocal track, at least) version that first surfaced in the early '80s. Someone else can probably better identify which CD issue is which, as far as which may have the best sound / "original" / widest stereo, etc. The mono "..deliver de letter.." version seems to crop up the most….

Would have to say that DCC's "metal venture" may prove surprisingly fruitful, as, believe it or leave it, the '80s era "nostalgia" is just about to the point where the folks that grew up with this shtuff are just now into a position financially to add these things at 30 bucks a pop to their shelves next to their "Matrix" and "Twin Peaks" DVDs. Meanwhile, I'll add another "vote" for a Steve Hoffman-ization of the Beatles' "first four" (giving us an alternative I'd bet would surely outsell the Capitol monos which I too have "boycotted" from day one).

Was pleasantly surprised to find out that so many of the "BSNers" were 10 or 15 years younger than one might assume when the whole "tastes in music" issue arose. Don't know if that whole "you like most what you heard on your car stereo at 16 or 17" approach works for the majority of us. I know most of my favorites were laid down years before I ever showed up, as is the case in numerous other respondents to this informal survey. Interesting to note that 3 of 6 songs cited in one reader's "best year" pick of 1965 were all remakes or covers ! ("You're the One", "Keep On Dancing", :"Over & Over").
Lots of folks chimed in with what I'd agree is the most appealing feature of the '50's -'60's radio shows - namely, the entire package: personalities, spots, jingles, theme songs, etc. First exposure to these treasures for most would have to be the old "Cruisin' " LP series of airchecks (some of the CD reissues I've heard are crudely re-edited & have different contents) There is bound to be tons of this stuff out there on the "www", what with RealAudio, etc. ….The ads are ten times more entertaining than anything you'd find in a week tooling around on the dial nowadays..

VARESE VINTAGE seems to have heard gripe of mine posted here last year about short song selections on most domestic CD reissues - witness recent 25 - track Cadences, Shirelles, etc. Guess it depends on the licensing deal they can swing, as recent "East Side Sound" series had skimpy 16 cuts each, spread over 4 volumes (not 3 - which I discovered only after hauling the first 3 volumes only home from the Rekkid shop, they had a 4th one I had somehow missed plugged on INSIDE notes….)… Well, at least they have the best sound yet for this stuff, and stereo rarities like "Land of 1000 Dances", and others. Still, plenty of "leftovers" that could make for a 5th & even 6th volume…. "Discover A Lover", "Pa - Cha", "Love Special Delivery", "(I Was a) Teenage Brain Surgeon", etc., etc…..

KIT KATS kuts....JAMIE JUNK :
The Bear Family 2 CD "The Jamie/Guyden Story" has mono "Sea of Love" by Kit Kats from '67 & stereo "Won't Find Better than Me" by New Hope from '69. This '95 set has uniformly excellent sound courtesy of wonderous wizard of wayback machine, "Little" Walter DeVenne. Only a couple of cuts have cropped up sounding better since then, and it was disappointing to read here of the "F -" Jamie U.S. Kit Kats 2 CD. Had been in contact with Jamie last year & they wanted input on their upcoming Jamie / Guyden CD reissues. When I replied that they need only follow Bear Family's lead - perhaps even re-reissuing the out-of-print collections the German label had put out from Barbara Lynn, The Sherrys (best non-Cameo/Parkway Cameo/Parkway hit: "Pop-Pop-Pop-Pie"), Duane Eddy, Ray Sharpe, R&R/R&B Philly to Phoenix, etc. - they promptly replied that, no, they wouldn't be issuing anything even slightly resembling the Bear CDs, but wanted to know "what was it that was so great about them ?" !! Rather than even bother replying with the obvious ("EVERYTHING" !), I never bothered any further with the issue. Now, it seems that they have out their Duane Eddy, plus various other collections out & I'm wondering …… do they all sound as bad as the Kit Kats ???

As for you "BOOT boys", send off those friendly free / gift "copies" (or "copies of copies") to me, ASAP. We can all sleep better knowing that it'll be so unburdening to you folks that have such pangs about having this stuff in your collections that it makes you feel better to make me "free" copies! Yahoo ! I'll be waiting to pounce on the mailman when he hauls a crate up to the mailbox fulla CD-Rs of :
- Un-Kleined Stones & Spector
- 9 hour long unedited live Who noodlings
- Those elusive "first four" Beatles original mixes (cowbell / harmonica / hi-hat errors included) ..oh, and a disc or 2 of "I Am The Walrus" takes (29 thru 93 & 94 thru 168),
- Properly-reverbed Chipmunks (only if I can get a see-thru red copy),
- Single-edits of Cameo-Parkway Frostbite 500 charters,
- Billy & Lilly, Association, Vogues, Andy Williams, Little Dippers & Frank Pourcel flip-sides,
- Unexpurgated James Brown "Say it Loud…" late-nite-Denny's-white kids-chorus-recruiting-attempts, ("Hey ! Wanna earn a cheeseburger, kids ?")
- "Around The World" (only if it has the choo-choo, Hot air Balloon & steamship SFX, panned & EQ-ed correctly),
- Non-Hong Kong press of U.S. (or other) issue of Stevie Wonder "Wonder Years" or "Century" or whatever they call it 4 CD set that has a complete, unedited, wide stereo "Fingertips".
- Any alternate lead - scream tracks from David Lee Roth, gold - plated, please.
- Unissued reels of glockenspiel underdubs from "Pet Sounds"

* * * All of the above must, of course, be in Stereo, please! * * * (And no "C.O.D.'s", either !)

((( - - Thanks in advance !!! - - ))) OK, OK, I'll wrap it up! Bye !


Name: Lex Bloom, Ahead To Stereo
From: Boston
Time: 2000-02-03 09:50:14
Comments: To Boppin' Brian: Does the Jamie/Guyden package contain a true stereo version of Brenda & The Tabulations' "Right On The Tip Of My Tongue"? I've been looking for that for years.

Name: Curt Lundgren
Website: Reel Top 40 Radio
From: Twin Cities, MN
Time: 2000-02-03 12:26:14
Comments: OK, group....where do I find "Gino Is A Coward" by Gino Washington (Ric-Tic) on disc? There is a 1999-issued CD on Norton which lists the track, but I suspect this might be a recent recording. I believe there was a two-disc Sequel title, too. Any advice appreciated!

Name: Steve Massie
Time: 2000-02-03 12:57:41
Comments: The Varese 25 track Shirelles "best of" CD has both the mono and stereo versions of "Baby It's You".

Name: Marty Wekser
From: Los Angeles
Time: 2000-02-03 13:44:24
Comments: Likewise, Varese used a good sounding stereo version of "Welcome Home Baby" on the same Shirelles 25 track package to which Steve Massie made reference. (A recent post inquired about this song too.) Suffice it to say, when you're dealing with an act which may have had 25 or more chart hits, you want to use the biggest hits, especially on the first compilation by the artist. In all fairness to Rhino, this is what they did on their early CD compilations which were generally limited to 18 tracks. Varese, however, has realized that many of these artists are now ripe for "freshened up" packages, so now there's room to go back and find those lower charting hits, more obscure "A" and "B" side singles, or in some cases unreleased tracks(in the case of The Chordettes), and include them on forthcoming releases. When the economics allow, 25 song packages will be issued.

Name: Marty Natchez
From: The Great Lakes
Time: 2000-02-03 14:33:02
Comments: Be assured, Curt, that the version of "Gino is a Coward" on Norton's "Gino Washington: Out of this World" CD (CED-268) contains not only the Ric-Tic hit but also an earlier waxing of the song as "I'm a Coward." The latter version is a completely different recording that was issued on the Correc-Tone label.

The Norton CD is an outstanding package of Michigan-music memorabilia; made even better by the fact that Washington still owns the master tapes. Needless to say, if you've ever heard his dynamite Wand recording of "Out of this World," you will be floored by how it sounds on this CD. You'll also learn that Telma Hopkins and Joyce Vincent -- later to join up with Tony Orlando as Dawn -- were the background singers on that record.

The CD also comes with a 20-page booklet that explores Washington's career in detail, and it is PACKED with vintage pictures, posters and labels of his 45s. Norton really outdid themselves on this release.

By the way, all imports CDs by "Geno Washington" contain recordings by a black American serviceman who gained popularity as a soul singer in the U.K. Check out the "e" in his name. He was NO relation to the Detroit Dynamo.


Name: Boppin' Brian
Website:
From: Sunny So Cal.
Time: 2000-02-03 14:43:36
Comments: "Right on the tip of my tongue" is on several compilations, the two that pop to mind right off the top of my head are the Bear Family + a skimpy Rhino'70s soul set.... not at home right now to check stereo-ness, but I know that there was at least 1 I have that is mono disc dub, another that is clean... again will check this out to-night... 1 of the reasons I got the J/G 2 CD was for their earlier soul smash "Dry Your Eyes", which, as it turned out was mono, if I recall correctly, but cleaner than ever. No word yet on Jamie's domestic B & the Ts CD... Anyone ?

Name: Curt Lundgren
Time: 2000-02-03 14:56:55
Comments: Thanks, Marty N....THAT's why I love this site!

Name: S Baird
From: The south
Time: 2000-02-03 15:25:51
Comments: To Lex Bloom RE the Jamie/Guyden set on Bear: Right On The Tip Of My Tongue is in the package but its mono.
Of the 29 songs in the set that charted in the top 100, 18 are mono, and 11 are stereo. If you want a listing of the songs, let me know and I'll send you one directly.

Name: Marty Natchez
From: The Great Lakes
Time: 2000-02-03 16:19:51
Comments: Concerning John Preston's claim that the 45 hit version of "Ain't That a Shame" by the 4 Seasons is a shorter 2:07 track and not the 2:34 version Rhino released on its "Four Seasons Greatest Hits Vol. 1" CD, the answer was in the grooves of my Vee Jay single, oval logo, matrix 63-3155 record.

The timing on the label is WRONG. The song is 2:34, even though my "4 Seasons Golden Hits" Vee Jay LP also lists the timing as 2:04. Thank goodness for a stopwatch.

I also want to express my gratitude to the BSN contributors who dashed the rumor that the Vee Jay pressings of "Sherry" had a different stereo mix. My lust quickly turned to dust, thanks to you guys.

Now I need another rumor squelched or confirmed: Was Frankie Valli's single version of "The Sun Ain't Gonna Shine Anymore" (Smash 1995) a different take or a different recording than the LP track? Will you professors help me again? Thanks.


Name: Groovin' Garrett
Website:
Time: 2000-02-03 16:56:46
Comments: Yes, the Norton CD "Out Of This World" by Gino Washington contains the cleanest issues of the songs available, and all are the original recordings. However, they're all mastered from vinyl (although mastered very well). It is a legitimate release, the discs being loaned by Gino himself. I would know, as Gino is a guest every Friday on my morning drive show on WPON radio in Detroit. GW still lives in the area, and makes regular appearances putting on a great show! Norton Records also recently released a great collection of early Cub Koda material that's worth picking up. You can check out Gino's bit every Friday morning at 6:00am EDT at www.wpon.com

Name: Bradley Olson
Website: Bradley Olson--A Person With Autism
From: Bemidji, Minnesota
Time: 2000-02-03 18:22:01
Comments: Marty, I agree that there are times when the stopwatch is more reliable than the label itself for timing. You never know when you need to use that as a reference.

Name: John Adkins
From: Phoenix
Time: 2000-02-03 23:12:45
Comments: Brian--Brenda & the Tabs is mono on the Rhino Soul Hits Of The '70s Vol. 4 CD, and a disc dub (one can hear surface noise at least once near the top). Not much of a high end on it either.

Name: Jay Connors
Time: 2000-02-03 23:41:59
Comments: Dear Boppin Brian, I have a Brenda and the Tabulations domestic release called Dry Your Eyes. JG4001-2. Contains 14 monaural songs. 12 were on the original dionn records release, and two are previous unreleased bonus tracks. I have it on right now listening to it, and the sound is wonderful. Unreleased bonus track is a bit of a mistake by the label to call them that as one was a single release that charted at number 17 in 1968, When You're gone, which is as good as anything else they have done (which is to say supurb)! This is a straight reissue of their 1967 LP Dry Your Eyes. Sound is from the original master tapes, and to me never sounded as clear. This is available at Tower on the Net. I bought it on sale for about twelve dollars a couple of months ago. Well worth the purchase! Lots of enjoyment from odd cuts like Beach Boys God Only Knows. Right on the Tip of my Tongue isn't on it, but a total of five charted items are. Is this the CD you were asking about or is there another one I don't know about?

Name: Test
Time: 2000-02-03 23:45:57
Comments:

Please excuse this post,      I just wanted to see

if future posts could be spruced up a bit.


Name: Alan T
Referred by: From a Friend
From: Phoenix
Time: 2000-02-04 00:14:44
Comments: Here’s one to question all you Stereo manic Beatles fans? The only reason the first four Beatles CDs are in mono because the Beatles were playing hardball with EMI during re-negotiation of their contract. The Fabs were upset with EMI’s accounting of sales of “Abbey Road” and other titles and were and negation had ground down to a halt. Since no new contract was at hand, the Fabs were operating under the contract Allan Klein had negotiated in 1969 that specifically stated that no remixes of the music were to be performed. The Fabs used this as a wedge to gain an advantage over EMI. Stereo remixes were done and early pressings done outside of EMI’s, although they are mono, clearly state that the CDs are ADD. I’m sure you’ve seen these, they were sold on the collector market. So much of EMI’s early CD output was remixed ADD that the Beatles should have gotten the same treatment. By the time the Help and Rubber Soul discs were released, this snafu had been cleared up allowing the remixes to be released. To save face, all the parties came up with “they were meant to be heard in mono”.

Name: Jay Connors
From: Greater New York Metro
Time: 2000-02-04 00:36:59
Comments: To Groovin' - I have tried to listen to your radio station so many times on the internet. (I like diversity in programming!) But the signal always skips. It's weird. No other stations I listen to do this. Part of a song plays, then the very same part plays again, sometimes seemlessly, sometimes with a short chop or break. It's not the CD or Vinyl skipping, because it does it when the announcer speaks as well, repeating same phrases with and sometimes without a break. It's weird, and sounds like a digital hiccup or something like that. It always happens! Not just sometimes. I don't want to give up because I think you guys are fun, but have you any idea how I could clear up the signal problem?

Name: Luke Pacholski
Website: LukPac.org
From: Madison, WI
Time: 2000-02-04 04:15:40
Comments: Alan, re: The fact that the first four are in mono has nothing to do with the Klein contract and everything to do with the fact Martin was dragging his heals. He didn't want the stereo mixes of the first four out in their original form - either (in the case of AHDN and BFS) they would be remixed, or released in mono. There was no time for remixing, so the mono. As far as the ADD stickers on the CDs - that was purely a misprint. The original intention was to use the original stereo mixes (AAD) for all four (this is what Martin was presented), but he disagreed with that decision. As for remixing or not - I'd have *no* problem seeing some Bob Irwin-esque remixes, but if they are going to be like Yellow Submarine, forget it. The current stereo tapes sound great - a simple remaster will do if necessary.

Name: Luke Pacholski
Website: LukPac.org
From: Madison, WI
Time: 2000-02-04 04:15:41
Comments: Alan, re: The fact that the first four are in mono has nothing to do with the Klein contract and everything to do with the fact Martin was dragging his heals. He didn't want the stereo mixes of the first four out in their original form - either (in the case of AHDN and BFS) they would be remixed, or released in mono. There was no time for remixing, so the mono. As far as the ADD stickers on the CDs - that was purely a misprint. The original intention was to use the original stereo mixes (AAD) for all four (this is what Martin was presented), but he disagreed with that decision. As for remixing or not - I'd have *no* problem seeing some Bob Irwin-esque remixes, but if they are going to be like Yellow Submarine, forget it. The current stereo tapes sound great - a simple remaster will do if necessary.

Name: Paul
Time: 2000-02-04 07:26:14
Comments: I heard Tossin & Turning in STEREO for the very first time coming home from work. Any idea if this is available, it sounded great. Is the artist Bobby Lewis? Can't seem to remember for sure! Thanks in advance

Name: Glenn Sauter
Time: 2000-02-04 10:05:20
Comments: To Luke: If I remember correctly, I read in the Washington Post at the time of the Beatles Mono/Stereo CD controversy that George Martin never intended for "Beatles For Sale" and "A Hard Day's Night" to be released in mono. He only wanted the first two CD's out in mono because he didn't believe these songs should be presented in twin-track stereo. However, he was willing to get on board at EMI with the Beatles CD's project and he intended to remix the catelogue for CD release beginning with "Beatles For Sale". However, according to the Post article, EMI felt this would delay all the releases and it would upset the whole release schedule which centered around the 20th anniversary of Sgt. Pepper. So EMI execs decided to go with the mono masters of the first four Beatles albums for their respective CD releases and initiated Martin's remixes with the CD release of "Help!". At least I believe that was the thrust of the article. An unrelated topic: Has "This Can't Be True" by Eddie Holman been stereo previously on lp or is it 1st time stereo on the newly released Liberty Bell Cameo/Parkway bootlegs?

Name: Mark the 45 fan
From: NC
Time: 2000-02-04 11:23:38
Comments: To Paul-Tossing and Turning is by Bobby Lewis, and appears in STEREO on Billboard Top Rock N Roll Hits-1961, on Rhino. Uh oh, did I say RHINO? Better pick it up before they recall it and "Rhimono" it...me and my BIG mouth.... Mark

Name: Christopher (
From: Hurricane, WV/USA
Time: 2000-02-04 12:08:24
Comments: This poor boy needs a little help. I recall the BSN newsletter mentioned a while ago that a compilation CD now contains the true STEREO mix of the Reflections' 1964 hit "(Just Like) Romeo And Juliet," but I can't for the life of me recall which disc this is. I searched the back issues in vain. So, would somebody out there please be good enough to e-mail me in private with this information? Thank you very much! Rock On!

Name: Luke Pacholski
Website: LukPac.org
From: Madison, WI
Time: 2000-02-04 14:33:26
Comments: Glenn, re: Actually, it was Martin who decided on the mono mixes. EMI's original plans were to issue the original stereo mixes of the first 4 albums. Shortly before the release, Martin was brought in as a matter of courtesy. He said a) the first two should not be in stereo at all, and b) if A Hard Day's Night and Beatles For Sale were in stereo they should be remixed, as he didn't like the current stereo mixes. However, this would have pushed back the release date, which EMI wouldn't have, so the mono mixes were issued (which I still feel was a *terrible* decision). For a (somewhat) helpful interview, see http://www.best.com/~abbeyrd/kozinn.htm

Name: Luke Pacholski
Website: LukPac.org
From: Madison, WI
Time: 2000-02-04 14:33:48
Comments: Glenn, re: Actually, it was Martin who decided on the mono mixes. EMI's original plans were to issue the original stereo mixes of the first 4 albums. Shortly before the release, Martin was brought in as a matter of courtesy. He said a) the first two should not be in stereo at all, and b) if A Hard Day's Night and Beatles For Sale were in stereo they should be remixed, as he didn't like the current stereo mixes. However, this would have pushed back the release date, which EMI wouldn't have, so the mono mixes were issued (which I still feel was a *terrible* decision). For a (somewhat) helpful interview, see http://www.best.com/~abbeyrd/kozinn.htm

Name: paul
Time: 2000-02-04 14:47:35
Comments: Christopher, Its on Dick Bartleys On The Radio Series Vol 2 Varese Sarabande Label Paul

Name: beetlefan
Time: 2000-02-04 17:38:20
Comments: I can't believe I actually agree with Luke on the Beatles situation, except, I don't mind the MONO CD's. :-)

Name: dave
From: smyrna, georgia
Time: 2000-02-04 19:08:10
Comments: I purchased the "All the hits by all the stars" Cameo/parkway cd.what a find. After all these years of hearing these songs above vinyl noise I finally get the CD quality sonics that should have been release many years ago.75 songs making their Cd debut.The wait is over. The only drawback is that some of Bobby Rydell's hits are missing."little bitty girl","Ding-a-ling","Good time baby","I've got Bonnie",and "Butterfly baby" aren't on this set of Cds.

Name: Martin T. Boratyn
From: California
Time: 2000-02-04 22:10:19
Comments: To Jay Johnston or anyone out there: I cannot locate www.samtherecordman.com on the internet. I tried a half dozen search engines. What gives? Does anyone have a telephone number? I am trying to locate a source to order "Witch Doctor" in stereo. Anyone's help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

Name: dan strode
Website:
Referred by: From a Friend
Time: 2000-02-04 22:27:09
Comments: sam the record man can be found at www.samscd.com

Name: dan strode
Website:
Time: 2000-02-04 22:37:08
Comments: found sam the record man using copernic - www.copernic.com - Copernic 2000 finds eactly what you're looking for by simultaneously consulting the best Internet search engines

Name: terryoregon
From: Beaverton, Oregon
Time: 2000-02-05 01:29:15
Comments:

OK, here's my challenge.  This is my stereo wish list.  These seven songs have eluded me in 30 years of collecting late fifties, early sixties music.  I know the expertise on this list must know more than I do about some of this stuff.

(1) Poor Little Rich Girl – Steve Lawrence   1963 (45 issued on Columbia 42795).  I have a copy of the original 45, but that's all I've ever seen for this song.    Steve was recording in stereo as early as 1959 and it seems likely this song would have been recorded multi-channel as well.  Of course his earlier stereo songs were on a different label.   Not only have I never seen this song in stereo, I've never seen this song re-issued EVER, on anything.    I've never heard any radio station play this song since the sixties. 

(2) What Does A Girl Do – Marcie Blane   1963 (45 issued on Seville 123).    This was the follow up to Bobby's Girl.   Since Bobby's Girl has appeared in wide true stereo, it is almost certain this song was also recorded in stereo.    This song is currently available on an import CD called "Marcie Blane with Tracey Dey".   But only Bobby's Girl is stereo.

(3) Java Jones – Donna Lynn   1964 (45 on Capital 5156) (LP on Capital 2085).    I obtained a sealed mono copy of this LP in the early eighties.   My Goldmine catalogue shows a stereo version of the LP.   But I've never seen this song issued on anything, mono or stereo.   And I've never heard any radio station play it since the sixties. 

(4) Kiss Me Sailor – Diane Renay    Diane Renay had one stereo LP (20the Century Fox 3133), currently worth $200 in mint condition.   I've checked the archives.    One message states that Navy Blue was rechanneled, but Kiss Me Sailor was true stereo.   The current Collectibles re-issue of the LP is all mono.  The back of that CD states   ". . .the original master tapes are unavailable".   Lost. . .or someone won't release them?  

Changing subject just slightly, the next three songs on my wish list are from those beach/ski movies from the early sixties produced by American International Pictures Inc.   Soundtracks from these movies were rare.    Yes, I know that Annette recorded about three LP's (at Disney studios) based on the title of these movies.  And I have them all.   However, those stereo songs did not appear on the AIP movies exactly as they did on the LP's, and the songs on the movies did not appear on the albums.  None the less,  I can always dream that some of the songs from those movies were recorded in a studio on a multi-track recorder before being copied onto the master film print.   Of course AIP was on a shoe string budget. . . .so I really am dreaming.  I've read AIP popped an incredible $250K on some of those movies.

(5)  Ski Party - Hondells    This was the title theme song to the AIP movie of the same title.   I have no evidence a soundtrack was ever issued for this movie and I have never seen this song issued on anything by the Hondells.   Even dubbing this song directly off the movie is difficult since the song never plays in its entirety without background voices over the music.

(6)  I'll Never Change Him - Annette Funicello    This solo by Annette was in Beach Blanket Bingo (1965).   I have lot of stuff by Annette, but I've never seen this song outside the movie.   In fact, I'm just guessing at the title to the song.  The credits at the end of the movie did not list the song titles.

(7)  I Think, You Think - Frankie Avalon & Annette   This duet is also from Beach Blanket Bingo.  Never seen or heard this song outside the movie either.   Again I'm guessing at the title.

One of the AIP beach movies is due to be released March 31st on DVD.  I assume most of the other AIP movies will follow.   If mastered correctly, especially the sound, I might at least get decent mono copies of some of this.

***If you are curious about any of these songs, you can click on the link below.  There are partial MP3 clips of all seven songs.*** 

www.integrityonline.com/terry/mp3.htm


Name: Luke Pacholski
Website: LukPac.org
From: Madison, WI
Time: 2000-02-05 03:54:52
Comments: Beetle, re: I *refuse* to buy the first 4 Beatles albums in their current form. Well, I've got Beatles For Sale, but that was a mistake... To me listening to the stereo mix of Eight Days A Week on the Red CD compared to the mono mix on BFS is just a world of difference - the mono CD just sounds so dull and lifeless to me. Hopefully I'll be getting good stereo copies of the first 4 shortly though, so...

Name: James Fortune
From: England
Time: 2000-02-05 07:38:02
Comments: Interested in Motown and other Sixties stuff :-)

Name: Jay Johnston
From: London, Ontario
Time: 2000-02-05 10:26:31
Comments: For Martin Boratyn: Sorry I lead you on a false trail with that URL. That was the old one that they first used, I guess it was too long so they shortened it to samscd.com. Anyway, go on the site and type in ' On My Radio ' under the song title box and it will bring you up the cd that you want, Top Hits of the 50's. It is available singly for $16.99 Canadian. There are, however, a total of 5 cds in the series- 50's - 90's, and you can get all five in a box set now for $69.99, which works out to $13.99 per disc. I only have the first three in the series, not really into the 80's or 90's material. Again, sorry to Martin and everyone else for the wrong URL, I should have checked the site first.

Name: Mike Arcidiacono
Time: 2000-02-05 14:06:21
Comments: To Terry/Oregon---Nice List you have there!! This is your lucky day!! I can help with a couple of your stereo wants. First off, you can find "Kiss Me Sailor" by Diane Renay in stereo, (and it sounds really great) on the Marginal Bootleg "Navy Blue". Midnight Records in Manhattan has it, and they do mail order. Its all taken from vinyl, but they hit most of her 45s. If you like Diane, its a must. For the Hondells "Ski Party", its been very elusive, however you can find it in mono (its NEVER been in stereo, anywhere) on the the "California Sunshine" Vol2 Cd, also available from Midnght Records. 33 tracks, not much stereo, but a whole lot of rare Hondells stuff. Quality is so so, there is alot of hiss on it, but at least its available. As for the other API songs, you are right that they operated on a shoestring, BUT they did issue a whole bunch a soundtrack LPs. The wierd thing is that alot of times, the versions on the LPs were NOT the version used in the films, they were re-recorded. I have the stereo versions of a bunch of them on DAT tape, but I would have to dig them out to see whats what. There *is* alot of stereo for the Annette/Frankie stuff on those LPs. Very enjoyable in true stereo, much more so than the mono. I hope this helps you out! Mikey

Name: Shirelles Fan
Website:
From: New Jersey, Exit 5
Time: 2000-02-05 15:38:56
Comments: The AP wire service is reporting the death of Shirley Kenner-Jackson of the Shirelles. What's interesting is that they credit Phil Spector with production of their major hits. To the best of my knowledge, Spector had nothing to do with the Shirelles. It was Luther Dixon, a brilliant producer himself, and one who knew how to record in stereo, that produced the Shirelles major hits.

Name: Marty Natchez
From: The Great Lakes
Time: 2000-02-05 18:21:58
Comments: For the sake of accuracy, the Associated Press reported that Doris Kenner-Jackson of the Shirelles -- not to be confused with lead singer Shirley Owens-Alston-Reeves -- died Friday (Feb. 4) at age 58. She had been battling breast cancer.

Yes, the AP carelessly misreported that Phil Spector was involved with the group's career. That's only a sign of the age group that's being hired as "responsible journalists" these days.

Now let's plan to listen to Doris singing "Dedicated to the One I Love" one more time and remember one of the stellar sisters from the girl group era who will never be forgotten. Amen.


Name: Ken Garland
From: Los Angeles
Time: 2000-02-05 22:06:04
Comments: Bet the reporter confused SPECTOR records with Phil.

Name: Ken Garland
From: Los Angeles
Time: 2000-02-05 22:07:03
Comments: Bet the reporter confused SPECTOR records with Phil. Instead of Sceptor records.

Name: Mike Arcidiacono
Time: 2000-02-06 10:50:30
Comments: To Terry/Oregon: Because I'm a nutty guy, I've done some more research for you on the "Beach Blanket Bingo" songs: You were correct on the titles of the two songs, they are: "You'll Never Change Him" by Annette Funicello. "I Think, You Think" by Annette and Frankie. Little side note, the songs "Fly Boy" and "New Love" in the film are seen being sung by Linda Evans, but thats not her voice, it is the voice of studio singer Robin Ward, who also had a huge hit with "Wonderful Summer" and a smaller hit with "In His Car" Now for the bad news. There was never a soundtrack of the movie songs issued. Nor were the Annette/Frankie songs released on 45s or other LPs. However, Donna Loren, who starred in the movie (she was a great singer also, by the way) had an Lp released by Capitol Records (and its her only LP) called , you guessed it: "Beach Blanket Bingo" which featured her singing all the songs from the movie, including "I Think, You Think" and "You'll Never Change Him". The LP WAS released in stereo, however, there IS a bootleg on Marginal called "The Best Of Donna Lauren" that I believe has ALL these songs and her other Capitol 45s that did not chart. Not sure about stereo content on that Cd, but I may pick it up, if I do I'll be sure to post here, as I always do. Lastly, the The song The Hondells do in the movie called "The Cycle Set" wasnt released on any of their LPs or 45s. However, it *may* be on one of the Volumes of the California Sunshine Series, it is NOT on Volume 2, which I have. Whew!! This Beach Party music thing is exhausting. Think I'll take a break and watch "How To Stuff A Wild Bikinni"!! Hope this helps. Mikey

Name: Lex Bloom
From: Boston
Time: 2000-02-06 11:32:18
Comments: To Luke P., and other stereophiles clamouring for stereo Beatles, it's now time to unite. Make all our voices louder. Let's face it, the decision to release the first four Brit catalog discs was just plain wrong. If George Martin feels it necessary to stick to his guns in that "Please Please Me" and "With The Beatles" shouldn't have been in stereo (on LP), and the stereo mixes of "A Hard Day's Night" and "Beatles For Sale" were unsatisfactory, that's too damn bad, because previously released on vinyl in both formats, the cat's already out of the bag. So, like I said, it's time to unite, make our voices louder - in other words, start shouting.

Name: Wendy Milliken
From: Los Angeles
Time: 2000-02-06 11:34:53
Comments: Lex, I love you. I couldn't agree with you more on the Beatles

Name: terryoregon
From: Beaverton, Oregon
Time: 2000-02-06 12:39:10
Comments:

Thanks everyone for the response to my post.   I received about six private e-mail messages as a result.   Looks like Kiss Me Sailor is obtainable in stereo.  A couple of the others, maybe.  Checking some leads now. 


Name: S Baird
From: Baton Rouge
Time: 2000-02-06 13:38:43
Comments: All this talk about Diane Renay -- where are her 2 hits available in Stereo? (I don't buy boots.)
Btw I have a copy of her "Stereo" LP. It sounds just OK, lots of surface noise.

To Luke & or Beetle: Is it possible using Toast to burn a copy of one of those multimedia CDs that have both music tracks and computer data on them> Also, Is there a way to record the same track on one CD-R at 1x, 2x, 4x & 6x to compare the sonic outcome. I tried doing this, but my audio CD player sees only track 1, not the other 3 copies recorded at the higher speeds. The Mac, on the other hand, sees and plays all tracks, but the speakers are, of course, no match for the home audio system. Any suggestions?


Name: Martin Nathan
Website:
Referred by: Yahoo!
From: Worcester,MA
Time: 2000-02-06 15:51:36
Comments: PLease tell me where to find track listings for the "On My radio" series, especially 50's, through 70's. TIA, Martin Nathan

Name: Jay Johnston
From: London, Ontario
Time: 2000-02-06 16:52:15
Comments: For Martin Nathan: To find the track listings for "On My Radio", go to http://emimusic.ca, the EMI Canada website. Click on" Catalogue" on the left menu, then"Catalogue Essentials" on the top of the next page. It will give you the listings of all five individual cds, as well as info on the box set that is being released for the 50th Anniversary of EMI Canada.

Name: MARTIN NATHAN
Referred by: Yahoo!
Time: 2000-02-06 17:10:07
Comments: To Jay Johnston, thank you very much for the info on where to find track listings for the "On My Radio" disks. Martin Nathan

Name: Luke Pacholski
Website: LukPac.org
From: Madison, WI
Time: 2000-02-06 17:55:47
Comments: Steve, re: Yes, you can use Toast to copy Audio/Data CDs. However, if you want to make an exact copy, you'll probably want to use Jam for the audio and Toast for the data - Toast can't copy the pause information like Jam does. As for multiple speeds - you're going to have to use multiple discs. Audio CD players only see the first session on a disc. So if you burn multiple sessions (ie, 1x, 2x, etc), your standard CD players will only see the first.

Name: Luke Pacholski
Website: LukPac.org
From: Madison, WI
Time: 2000-02-06 18:00:43
Comments: I just picked up "Freddy King Sings", and it notes the songs are in stereo for the first time. More specifically: "An audio information/image recovery system developed by Keith Keller's Digital Soundscapes was used in remastering the original King Records dual-mono, two track studio masters, converting them to true stereo for this release. The recovery system delivers live-performance ambience and image information otherwise inaudible on the studio masters. This first-ever conversion to true stereo of dual-mono source material makes this reissue a milestone in archival sound restoration." Upon listening to the disc, the stereo soundstage is fairly narrow, but it *is* true stereo. Does anyone know exactly how this system works? Or what a "dual-mono master" is...?

Name: Joel Goldenberg
From: Montreal
Time: 2000-02-06 21:01:32
Comments: Please, please someone write a book detailing the differing versions of songs in their album/single formats, not only mono/stereo but different takes, edits, etc. I just now heard the album version of You Are The Sunshine of My Life without the horn overdubs (on Stevie Wonder's box set, brilliant). The Who's Trick of the Light is about 30 seconds shorter on 45 - some of the guitar solo is poorly edited out. The Carpenters have many differences, such as added guitar overdubs for the singles. If someone can write a whole book on Beatle variations (Every Little Thing), someone could do the same for singles.

Name: Martin Nathan
Website:
Referred by: Yahoo!
From: Worcester,MA
Time: 2000-02-07 00:36:24
Comments: Does anybody know if any more volumes of the "Hey Look What I Found" series are going to be released. I have all 9 volumes and I love the song selection, though I could imagine some folks despising it. It would be great if future volumes focused on obscure tunes from the late '60s to early '80s. Martin Nathan

Name: beetlefan
Time: 2000-02-07 04:16:48
Comments: Joel, that's a great idea. To be honest, I don't have the inclination to write a book, but if anyone here cares to, i'll be more than happy to contribute.

Name: Curt Lundgren
Website: Reel Top 40 Radio
From: Twin Cities, MN
Time: 2000-02-07 16:45:13
Comments: Speaking of the Mavis "Look What I Found" series....a question: Volume 7 contains what is billed as the original Judd version of Tommy Roe's "Sheila". Is there anything special about this versus the ABC-Paramount hit? I'm also curious as to the various versions of "Look For A Star". I'm not familiar with the Dean Hawley version (volume 6), but Garry Mills (vol 5) and Garry Miles (vol 6) were both played by the local top 40s here....one on each station. Is there a story behind the latter two? Specifically, the nearly-indentical spellings...and the fact that while Mills' version was on Imperial, the *Miles* tune was on the parent label, Liberty! (Unless Lew Chudd hadn't sold Imperial yet.) Miles, of course, was really Buzz Cason.

Name: Henri Bronsgeest
Time: 2000-02-08 01:14:15
Comments: Ah yes, LOOK FOR A STAR, my favorite topic. I fell in love with the movie CIRCUS OF HORRORS, a strange English movie that hit the theaters in the summer of 1960. The stars were basically unknown at the time, but became well known. Anton Diffring later Fahrenheit 541, Donald Pleasance (with hair!) who starred in James Bond, and all those scary movies. While the star attraction swings from a rope high in the center ring, a song played. LOOK FOR A STAR. As people left the theaters they would humm that tune. Knowing a good thing when they saw it, Imperial got the rights to the soundtrack from England and released an LP. Very hard to find and usually costs around $100. The singer in the movie and sountrack was an English gent named Garry Mills. Imperial released it as a single. (The version on Look What I found. . is NOT the same as the 45, nor album, nor movie soundtrack) Liberty seeing a good thing had Buz Cason record the song as Garry Miles. I'm sure they named him that to confuse the public. Goldmine magazine recently did a story on the producers who heard about CIRCUS OF HORRORS, went to the theater with a tape recorder, copied the song in the theater, went back to the studio, and had Deane Hawley record it, so now we had three version cluttering the market. This does not include the instrumental version by Billy Vaughn for the "adult" market. All FOUR were top 30 hits!! Can you imagine if only one version had been released, I'm sure it would have hit number 1. For some reason this song has been ignored by the oldies market, and other than Lost Hits from the 60's which has the Garry Miles (Buz Cason version) is not available in good form anywhere. Except, of course, the Billy Vaughn version. Hope this helps.

Name: Jason Roberts
Website:
From: Providence, RI
Time: 2000-02-08 07:25:28
Comments: In addition to the Mills, Miles, and Hawley versions of "Look For A Star", there was also a version on Laurie Records by Nicky Como. This version was more up-tempo and received some airplay and local chart action in New England. It's not a bad version, but it's very hard to find. I have a well-used 45 and have been looking for years for a better one!

Name: Doug Peck
From: Elk Grove, CA
Time: 2000-02-08 10:51:35
Comments: For "Look For a Star" fans: The Miles (Liberty) version can be found on the Ace compilation "Teenage Crush Volume 2" (CDCHD 701) and the EMI/Capitol Special Markets "Lost Hits of the 60's" (19552). The Hawley version was released in 1987 on an obscure Allegiance compilation, "Sun Sand and Hunks", CDP-72898, distributed by CEMA.

Name: Henri Bronsgeest
Time: 2000-02-08 12:20:44
Comments: Thank you for the information on Look For A Star by Nick Como. I had heard of that one, and have it listed on my want list. I did not know where it had received airplay. I was from Southern CA at the time. KFWB played the three versions I mentioned, but I don't believe I ever heard Como's. I had always hoped that someone would release the soundtrack album on CD and add as an extra bonus all the various versions. Ah, if I only had money!!!

Name: Uncle Al
From: Long Isalnd, NY
Time: 2000-02-08 15:16:54
Comments: To Joel: An excellent, comprehensive, and better than 99% acurate listing of all the Beatles "variations" can be found at "The Usenet Guide for Beatles Recording Variations" at: http://www.columbia.edu/~brennan/beatles/var-index.html Be warned that this will give you a whole new perspective on being a Beatles completist!

Name: Der Deutschenmann
From: Der Schweiz
Time: 2000-02-08 16:58:46
Comments: Ich mochte zu wissen, bitte sag mir etwas!! Wo kann ich "Song of Joy" von Miguel Rios (auf Englisch, naturlich! im truesche Stereo!) an CD kaufen?

Name: Lex Bloom, Ahead To Stereo
From: Boston
Time: 2000-02-08 19:04:52
Comments: Hey - who is Wendy Milliken?

Name: Larry Davis
From: Longview WA
Time: 2000-02-08 20:03:39
Comments: For the writer in German (who I suspect is putting us on) the only place I've found Miguel Rios' "Song Of Joy" is on a 1998 EMI (UK) compilation called A TIME TO REMEMBER 1970. I think I picked this up at In Your Ear (which is no longer in business, but they refer you to CDNow). I haven't played it in a while but I think it was in stereo.

About the only thing not mentioned in the "Look For A Star" discussion is that the version by Garry Miles is on HEY LOOK WHAT I FOUND Vol. 4; Garry Mills' is on Vol. 5; and Dean Hawley's is on Vol. 6. ALSO, Garry Mills' Imperial single had Part 1 on one side and Part 2 on the other. Is is possible that the version used on HEY LOOK is Part 2 rather than the hit Part 1?

Name: Henri Bronsgeest
Time: 2000-02-08 20:47:24
Comments: The Garry Mills single Look for a Star on Imperial part 1 and part 2 are identical. They just took it off the soundtrack LP and had nothing to put on the back, unless of course they could have use an instrumental from the movie. They are not the same as Hey Look ...

Name: Christopher Kissel
From: Long Island, NY
Time: 2000-02-08 20:54:23
Comments: After reading a scathing review of the new Kit Kats CD here a couple of weeks ago I wanted to respond to what I felt were very unwarranted criticisms. Contrary to what has been posted, the Jamie 2 CD set presents the music in a stunning true stereo mix that matches the feel of the original LP mixes in a far more satisfying way than most attempts at new stereo mixes. The individual mentioned "rechanneled effects"... perhaps they should have their hearing checked, one of their ears apparently is suffering from a high frequency rolloff. Besides the superb new stereo mixes, the music itself is incredible. If you are not familiar with the Kit Kats' music, you owe it to yourself to sample some of it. The group had a unique style and sound and displayed amazing versatility. Personally... I can't remember when I was so pleased overall with a CD... the packaging, liner notes, discography, photos, and new stereo mixes are all superb and are all obviously a labor of love! I suggest that all BSN readers pick up a copy of this great tribute to the Kit Kats while it is still in print!

Name: Sunny Jim
Website:
From: Philadelphia, PA
Time: 2000-02-09 10:25:27
Comments: RE: Kit Kats CD: Sorry Chris, I have to respectfully disagree with you on every point. The CD is not stunning. It is badly engineered and mastered. The instrumental bed on which the stereo vocals have been overlaid has had some awful pseudo-rechannelling effect applied to it. I wrote the original review and I stand by it after repeated listenings. I'm happy to say that both my hearing and my system are in top-notch shape.

To hear what I'm talking about, use the first appearance of the song "Won't Find Better Than Me' on disc 1 of the set. This is the Kit Kats version, and it has never appeared in true stereo before. Turn the balance control on your system all the way to the left. You will hear a track in which most of the bass and high end has been filtered out. Now, turn the balance all the way to the right, and you will hear a track in which most of the mid-range has been filtered out. Neither of these tracks sound at all natural.

Listening closely, you can hear that the true stereo vocal track was laid on top of this pseudo-rechannelled mess, and the overall effect is most unpleasant. In fact, it sounds like the rechannelled vinyl LP version of the album that came out in the 60's. This weird effect has been applied to every track on the disc, even the New Hope tracks that were in great stereo on the original LP. What's even more surprising is that, in some places, you can tell, even through the rechannelling nonsense, that there is a true stereo instrumental bed underneath. Why in the world would anyone go to the trouble of creating a true stereo background, only to rechannel it? This CD is a sonic nightmare.

I think the point that bothers me the most is that the Kit Kats were not wildly popular, thus this is probably the only shot that their music will have at appearing on CD, and the release has been badly botched. I'm really glad that I kept my vinyl. As with my last post, all of the above is only in my humble opinion. To each his own!

Name: Marty Blaise
Time: 2000-02-09 11:21:01
Comments: Can anyone verify if any of the following exist in true stereo? Fireballs - Torquay, Bulldog; Hebb, Bobby - A Satisfied Mind; Johnny & the Hurricanes - Crossfire; Rivers, Johnny - Under Your Spell Again; Rooftop Singers - Tom Cat; Royal, Billy Joe - I’ve Got To Be Somebody. Thanks.

Name: Paul Bigelow
From: Austin, TX
Time: 2000-02-09 16:04:58
Comments: Is there any word on The Fendermen : Mule Skinner Blues CD that is for sale in the latest "Collector's Choice Music" catalogue? The catalogue claims ten bonus tracks.

Name: Dave
From: Tucson
Time: 2000-02-09 16:39:27
Comments: Marty, Johnny Rivers "Under Your Spell" is in stereo on Rhino 70793, The Johnny Rivers Anthology. Dave

Name: Alan Carner
From: Fort Smith
Time: 2000-02-09 17:51:55
Comments: Can anyone tell me if there are any differences in blank CDR discs. Are any brands better than others? I've tried a few brands, and they seem to be the same. Sometimes I make one that has trouble playing back.

Name: Curt Lundgren
Website: Reel Top 40 Radio
From: Twin Cities, MN
Time: 2000-02-09 18:09:34
Comments: Just listed at DisCollector, Ace's 30-track "Coed Story" in the March Top Ten Sizzlers! The Ace website has nothing on it. I would hope we'll get the Duprees "Have You Heard" and/or the Crests "Trouble In Paradise" in stereo. We also need a better job on Adam Wade than what Collectables has done. BTW, Mike is selling the Fendermen disc for $11.99: http://www.discol.com

Name: Lex Bloom, Ahead To Stereo
From: Boston
Time: 2000-02-09 18:59:54
Comments: To Alan Carner: RE: CD-Rs: Yes, there are differences, albeit the principal basically the same. I haven't gotten too deeply invoved with the rewritable CD-Rs, for one thing, they are on the expensive side. So, let's look at the regular ones. First of all, once recorded, the results are permanent, cannot be changed. The standard length CD-R is 74 minutes, at 650 megabytes. CD-Rs can be recorded to store audio tracks, or computer data. The recording side of a CD-R is comprised of a dye called cyanine, formulated from an organic synthesis process; it is dark blue in color. That's somewhat standard nowadays, but the best ones I've used I found at (of all places) CompUSA; it is a 50-pack spindle of gold CD-Rs with advanced phthalocyanine dye (projected to have the longest shelf life, at 200 yrs) for $49.99, SKU# 268350. Those are (I repeat) the best I've ever used. I hope I've helped.

Name: beetlefan
Time: 2000-02-09 23:54:32
Comments: Lex, I will also add that phthalocyanine dye CD-R's are very good. The Cyanine discs are good too. The best i've used are Sony (Tayio Yuden), Memorex (only ones made by Tayio Yuden), TDK, and Ricoh. I do not recommend Maxell at all.

Name: Charles Curtiss Carpenter
Website: The Cammy Awards
From: Pinebluff NC
Time: 2000-02-10 00:47:18
Comments: Recently we lost Will "Dub" Jones of the Coasters and Richard "Dimples" Fields has also recently passed away. Just thought I would pass the info along.

Name: VWFANPAC
Time: 2000-02-10 00:57:56
Comments: CDR'S....Quite to the contrary...Maxell CDR's from JAPAN are quite indicative to superior sound and convienence...They are also manufactured in TAIWAN maybe that's why dear BEETLE dislikes them so..but when one of the 3 oracles speak we all must listen with an open ear(MONO) Post haste! Maybe we can find a MONO cdr that only records on one channel indeed!...Plus they have a lovely white jewel tray...and a shiny jewel case...and a beautiful golden coating that no light can pass thru...I just love them!....STEREO FOREVER...just a thought........

Name: beetle
Time: 2000-02-10 05:14:45
Comments: And WHO are YOU?!

Name: Lex Bloom, Ahead To Stereo
From: Boston
Time: 2000-02-10 09:42:11
Comments: Thank you, beetle, for your output on CD-Rs. The very first ones I ever saw were indeed from Taiyo Yuden, which were gold on dark green. The cyanine dye was green only because of the bright gold plating. However, I avocate the use of discs with ADVANCED phthalocyanine, due to their projected long shelf life (about 200 yrs) and higher resistance to heat. Among those are Ricoh Platinum or Mitsui. The dye leans more toward greenish-silver in color, more like what a storebought CD looks like anyway. The discs I found were made by a outfit called FMI (Taiwan, or maybe USA) and are available at CompUSA in 25-packs or 50-pack spindles. The 50-pack lists for $49.99, but keep an eye for them to go on sale for $29.99 at a given moment; averaging .60 per disc, that's almost a steal.

Name: george
From: new york
Time: 2000-02-10 10:09:29
Comments: Is there another Kitkats cd? The one I bought called, Its About Time sounds great and most of it is in stereo.Does the other cd you are talking about have the other songs from the new hope album that aren't on this double cd or the live album? I would still like to hear those other songs the Kitkats used to sing.My records are so worn out from playing them I would be willing to buy this other cd even though its not as good as long as there are no scratchy record sounds on it.I have enough of those cds now.

Name: Mikey
Time: 2000-02-10 10:32:29
Comments: Hi guys. If anybody has The Bachelors 2CD set "The Decca Years" or the EMI 30 track import Cd, please email me, I have some questions about it. Thanks! Mikey

Name: beetlefan
Time: 2000-02-10 13:37:55
Comments: What do you think of this? http://www.canoe.ca/JamMusicBeatles/feb10_reissue.html

Name: Luke Pacholski
Website: LukPac.org
From: Madison, WI
Time: 2000-02-10 13:43:39
Comments: I'm thinking I don't want more "YS" remixes... Remixes are fine (read: Bob Irwin), but I didn't care for those. Yes, they were interesting, but IMO they screwed too much up. It also notes George Martin will be involved - NO!

Name: Mike Arcidiacono
Time: 2000-02-10 16:40:56
Comments: Re: The Beatles URL below. This is VERY good news!!! The gist of the article is that EMI is going to remix the ENTIRE (you read that right) Beatles Catalouge in 5.1 Sound. This is very exciting!! Finally, the mono versions will be a thing of the past. I also read elsewhere that the sales of the 5.1 "Yellow Submarine" DVD were astronomical.....no doubt that had a lot to do with EMIs decision. Profit is paramount!! Now as to the two track mixes of the first few lps, dont wonder how they could mixed into 5.1 . They can!! there are many variables that affect it, but there is enough raw material to do a good job. Because the instros and vocal tracks are totally seperate from one another, that makes it possible to spread both, use Digital EQ (the bass guitar can be effectively filtered out and moved to a seperate channel) and make a convincing 5.1 mix. Trust me, it works!! As for the 4 track Beatles stuff, now THATS going to be a revelation. Can you imagine "Sgt Peppers" in 5.1 with horn overdubs coming in from behind you? I realize that a lot of guys on this board are strictly stereo buffs....but, I can tell you this...after you have listened to a good 5.1 mix, you never want to go back. Its as simple as that! Its the difference between mono and stereo all over again, basically. All you have to do is listen to the YS DVD, its just amazing how great it sounds. I was on a Beatles "variations" site the other day, and apparantly, there are "edit reels" of tape that have various pieces of things that were edited into Beatles 45s, like Harmonica overdubs, vocal overdubs and guitar overdubs, sitting all alone by themselves on a seperate reel of tape. If they were hopelesly out of tracks, George Martin would sometimes hand sync these edit pieces into the 45 and stereo mixes, rather than do a sound on sound overdub that would put the sonic quality back yet another generation. Sounds goofy, I know, but Beatle experts swear that they did it, and I believe them. If anybody could, Martin could, he was an master of the trade. With todays Computer syncing, these edit pieces can now be placed anywhere in the 5.1 spectrum, so that the harmonica intro in say, "I Should Have Known Better" (which really is supposed to exist by itself on a seperate reel) might be placed in the rear left channel in a 5.1. mix. This decision by EMI opens up a whole lot of exciting possibilities. Who knows, maybe the reason that EMI hasnt released the first four lps in stereo the last few years is because they saw how 5.1 DVDs ere exploding and knew the NEXT way to exploit the Beatles catalog was a complete 5.1 overhaul, getting us to buy the same stuff yet AGAIN. EMI is not shy about manipulating the Beatles catalog to pull in money, as we all know. Stay tuned! Mikey

Name: Luke Pacholski
Website: LukPac.org
From: Madison, WI
Time: 2000-02-10 21:09:45
Comments: Re: Beatles. First - edits reals. Eh...that was most common in the very early days, and even then, not all that common. If they wanted to do an overdub on twin-track they would generally just go down a generation. As far as the four track stuff - up through Rubber Soul everything is straight four track - 4 tracks on a single tape. Starting with Revolver, it would be common to record the basic track on 4 tracks of one tape, then dub that down to one or two tracks on a another tape, and overdub some more. The process would repeat. What they did for YS was sync all these tapes together, meaning you could have something like 12 or 16 seperate tracks to work with... As for surround remixes - first of all, CDs are stereo. End of story. You can't put 5.1 on CD. Second, I don't like the idea of (for example) filtering out the bass track. I've heard it before (on Beatles recordings to boot) and I've never liked it. The bass doesn't sound right, and the rest of the track sounds tinny. Sorry - I'll take good transfers of the original twin tracks, wide separation and all. I wouldn't mind *good* remixes of the early 4 track stuff (ie, same stereo placement, reverb, etc - what Bob Irwin does) but a) with Revolver or so, the stuff starts to get too complex to remix *well*, and b) I don't want revisionist remixes (see Yellow Submarine). The YS remixes just don't *sound* right to me... Ahh, well.

Name: Mike Arcidiacono
Time: 2000-02-10 21:53:42
Comments: Rw: Beatles. Luke...one question for you: Have you listened to the YS DVD on a properly balanced, quality 5.1 speaker system ??(and I dont mean one with tiny little cube speakers for 99 dollars, either). If you HAVE, then I dont know how you could be unhappy with the YS remix...its simply stunning. Eleanor Rigby is an almost religous experience, putting the listener right in the middle of the String quartet. If you HAVENT, then you dont know what youre missing!! And yes, you are right about Cds not handling 5.1 audio. However, theres no secret that the record companies are focused on DVD audio as the next platform. Cds as we know them are reaching the end of their lifecycle. As soon as folks were able to copy them digitally, the record companies knew they had to find something new that could be encripted AND get us to buy our record collections again. I sort of get the feeling that you just dont like DVDs..... thats unfortunate, because in a few years you wont have a choice.....ALL new releases will be on DVD. Bet on it.

Name: Joe
From: Burbank
Time: 2000-02-10 23:06:15
Comments: I'm with you, Mikey. 5.1 is here to stay and I'm excited by the prospects. HOWEVER don't expect all (or many) of the remixes to be stunning. Engineers can't agree on what constitutes a good 5.1 mix. As in stereo mixing, some shoot for as wide a mix as possible, while others feel the sonic spectrum should resemble that of a live show (near mono). I recently attended a 5.1 trade show demo function and was both amazed and discouraged by what I heard. It was disconcerting to hear lead vocals sitting on the top of my head, and I had trouble with parts of the rhythm section sitting behind me. I loved the surround effect of background vocals and support instruments. Some mixes used the rear speakers for ambience only (yecch!) and some were just crazy (left hand of the piano placed left rear -- right hand placed right front!) Now, I'm not criticizing the Beatle remixes. I'm sure they will be handled with great care, but I do fear a whole new batch of rechanneled stuff for 5.1. Why dig out the multi-tracks when a simulated 5.1 mix can be made from the 2 track stereo master? Hey, I could be wrong.

Name: Christopher Kissel
From: Long Island, NY
Time: 2000-02-10 23:06:43
Comments: It is nice to see some agreement regarding the great stereo mixes on the Jamie Kit Kats CDs. Unfortunately, one individual who chooses to hide behind a couple of anonymous postings feels the need to trash the hard work that evidently was put into the mixing of the CDs. One has to wonder about that individual's real motivation for disparaging what is really a superb release. I'm sure other readers of this forum also disregard these types of anonymous postings by individuals that obviously have their own agenda.

Name: beetlefan
Time: 2000-02-10 23:29:59
Comments: Amazing! Again, I find myself agreeing with Luke on the subject of stereo Beatles! I didn't particularly care for YS either, but I apreciate it for what it is. I have a feeling that I won't like the new 5.1 mixes, either. Don't worry, I still like the mono mixes.

Name: C.D. Blanque
From: Redwood City, CA
Time: 2000-02-11 00:25:51
Comments: After exhaustive research and testing, MY favorite three brands of recordable CDs are: 1: WAL-MART EXCELSIOR ** Inexpensive house brand. With purchase of 10, you get free roll of Brawny paper towels. 2: MAXWELL BRAND ** Sold online at bootleg.com. Artwork looks like the more familiar Maxell brand. For the price however, they're ok. Company also markets blanks under the names TD-KAY and Fiji. 3: LAFAYETTE RADIO ** Made exclusively for Lafayette Radio by the same people who used to make Irish tape. Acceptable quality, low price. For a limited time, you get a free dozen when you buy any tape recorder made by Wilcox-Gay, Pentron, Wollensak, Webcor or V-M (Voice Of Music.) All of the above brands can be used to record stereo!

Name: Dan Asvitt
Website:
Time: 2000-02-11 01:42:18
Comments: Joel and Beetlefan,there is no reason to write a book, Pat Downey already has. Top 40 Music on Compact Disc(available at DiscCollector) lists all of the various versions of a song and where they can be found. Pat also denotes whether the song is in stereo or mono. And it's a nice touch that he includes the various Time Life albums. Unfortunately, though, he does not include import albums, such as the great Ace compilations, which are readily available in this country. A potential disadvantage is that Downey's book only lists songs that made the Top 40, but I do not think this is much of a factor since most songs that had an album/stereo mix and a single/mono mix were Top 40 hits anyway. This book is a nice complement to Mike's newsletter and Oldies on CD, since Mike grades the quality of the music, which Downey does not. And, of course, Mike does not restrict his reviews to top 40 music. Marty, "A Satisfied Mind" by BOBBY HEBB was release in stereo on vinyl, but has not been released on CD.

Name: Sunny Jim
Website:
From: Philadelphia, PA
Time: 2000-02-11 07:25:26
Comments: Regarding the Kit Kats, again: I'm truly sorry and disappointed that Christopher Kissel feels it necessary to assign ulterior and sinister motives to my review of the Kit Kat's CD. There are none. I have been a Kit Kats/New Hope fan for many years, having seen them perform live several times. I don't personally know anyone who was involved in the production of the CD. The only axe I have to grind is that the CD's sound was a big let-down and I expected and anticipated much better. I cannot accept the idea that I should just be happy to have anything by the group on CD. If I support poor quality CDs, then I am just encouraging the release of more of them. And, to my ears, the Kit Kats disc is poor quality. The appreciation of music being very subjective, different people are going to hear the disc in different ways. If you like it and it works for you, great. However, I posted to express an opinion, albeit a strong one, and to give my impression of the CD. And when you think about this a bit, all of the reviews of music given by anyone are just opinions, one as valid as the next. Reasonable people can disagree reasonably, without the need for either personal attacks or conspiracy theories!

Name: beetlefan
Time: 2000-02-11 10:28:40
Comments: O.K., I have Pat Downey's 1996 edition of "Top 40 Music On Compact Disc" in front of me and while it does list if something is stereo/mono/45 version/LP mix, it does not detail differences, which is what Joel and I were talking about. And, Dan, you pointed out that it restricts itself to the top 40. Pat did a fine job and his book and it is an invaluble reference, and I use it, but for collectors like ourselves, I think the contents being restricted to just the Top 40 of the Hot 100 or whatever is woefully restrictive. I do realize that detailing differences could be a massive undertaking.

Name: Jay Connors
Time: 2000-02-11 13:48:29
Comments: To those of you who may be recording on "music" CDs, for "home" CD recorders,(Pioneer, Marantz, Phillips, etc)I do have some differences to report regarding name brands of blank recordable music CDs. TDK is wonderful. Used many with no problems at all. Maxell is good too, no problems encountered so far. Kodak is not good. Many problems with many discs, both with compatability with other machines and skipping on the discs themselves. Usually works perfectly until you get to around number 23, 24, 25 tracks. Then clears up again for higher numbers. This happens on several different recordings I have made. Let me clarify by saying that there is absolutely no problem recording and playing back on the same deck. But when you record on the Pioneer, and play back on a boombox for example, Kodak does skip on some of the higher tracks as I have indicated. Maxell and TDK never have in my experience. There is a fourth brand which I have started using, with excellent results, and the lowest price of any found so far: Nashua brand found at Staples in the New York area. Package of ten only $17.99 including a bonus of a "marking pen", which is handy as it turns out. The sound is crystal clear, and so far no skipping or compatibility problems at all. Remember that I am referring only to "For Music Use Only" CDs which have the special tax (Not to mention restrictive coding) which goes to the artists whose work we may be "ripping off." Stay away from Kodak, no matter how cheaply you can obtain them. They are trouble.

Name: beetlefan
Time: 2000-02-11 15:00:47
Comments: Well, for the computer side, I use Sony and TDK data blanks almost exclusively for serious jobs and clients. I use Imation, Fuji and the rest for demos and quickies for the can and short term storage. I understand Yamaha is very good and to stay away from Kodak. They may make your pictures count but they count out my music.

Name: Paul Bigelow
From: Austin, TX
Time: 2000-02-11 15:22:18
Comments: While 5.1 may not be to everyone's liking, it is already here and classic and modern music CD's using DTS encoding are available for purchase right now. Currently I have:

Wings - Band on the Run
Wings - Venus and Mars
Santana - Abraxas
Moody Blues - Days of Future Passed
Steve Miller - Fly Like and Eagle
Police - Greatest Hits

The quality of the mix varies, but there is something interesting going on here and I plan to obtain more. These CD's are put out by DTS and Mobile Fidelity International (I think there is some association to the old Mobile Fidelity by way of Brad Miller).

These CD's are really fun. Maybe now I can justify my Sansui QRX-9001 receiver!


Name: Bradley Olson
Website: Bradley Olson--A Person With Autism
From: Bemidji, Minnesota
Time: 2000-02-11 15:47:35
Comments: Re: DTS. I don't have any DTS titles because I don't have a CD player that can play DTS titles, plus I can't afford them. Conventional stereo and mono is fine enough for me.

Name: Uncle Al
Time: 2000-02-11 16:23:51
Comments: All of the DTS 5.1 discs mentioned by Paul are re-releases of the old Quadrophonic mixes used in the 70's. It seems strange to me that Quadrophonic sound was ultimately rejected by the public, probably due to competing formats (on records:SQ and QS matrix, CD4 Discreet. On tape: 4 track discreet on 8-track cartridges, reel to reel discreet). In the late eightees, the lesser of the formats came back as "Dolby Surround" (which WILL decode your old QS/SQ records!) Now we are taking the discreet 4 channel masters and making DTS discs from them. My question is: If discreet 4 channel sound was rejected 25 years ago, why will it be accepted now? I remeber the following annoying traits: 1) Vocal and Center Channel info was mixed equally in all four channels. It made it sound like the singer was in your head. 2) Being surrounded by the instruments made casual listening impossible.

Name: Paul Bigelow
From: Austin, TX
Time: 2000-02-11 22:31:33
Comments: Well there were several factors in the 70's that contributed to "quads" demise:

1. Several different, competing systems
2. Expensive outlays for the systems (1970's dollars)
3. Wildly varying quality of the reproduction (reel to reel and 8-track wasn't a serious option for most people, although those afforded the best "discrete" methods) as most home decoders were not up to the task.

An opinion: "quad" was probably ahead of its time. "Surround" movies weren't the norm, and stereo movies rare. Television was mono and most automobile radios were mono. Today, "surround" is a must in any serious "home theater" and the requirements are understood by more people than just "hi-fi nuts". So, folks have already invested into "quad" and do not even know it. The 5.1 CDs are for those individuals who can appreciate music in that format.


Name: S. Baird
From: Baton Rouge
Time: 2000-02-12 02:17:11
Comments: When does the parade of Disney characters begin? Will they be coming from our left, right, front or rear? Who will have the sno cones and who the cotton candy?
5.1 channel sound may have its place with video extravaganzas, but I just can't see how hearing the Beatles' All You Need Is Love, with the horns in the rear, and each of the Fab Four in his own channel can come anywhere close to a real musical event. I guess all these years that I've been hearing audio folks rant about how they want things to sound real and natural was just a bunch of hooey. The next thing I guess y'all will want will be scratch and sniff components, which oughta be great when you're listening to Zappa's song about the yellow snow.

Name: Dan Asvitt
Website:
Time: 2000-02-12 02:38:11
Comments: Sorry Beetlefan, but I think you are being overly critical about Pat Downey’s book. To take an example, THE SHANGRILAS, Downey notes that one version of I Can Never Go Home Anymore “includes an extra line at 2:30 that goes ‘listen I’m not finished’ which was not on the original 45 or LP”. On Remember (Walkin’ in the Sand) he notes that one version is “:22 longer than the 45 or LP; is missing echo throughout.” To take another example, Downey notes that all versions of DONNIE BROOKS Mission Bell have “more echo than the original 45 or LP”. He notes which versions of SWINGIN’ MEDALLIONS Double Shot have the “worst hangover” lyric, and which have the “worst morning after” lyric. In addition to the above types of distinctions, I find it very helpful to have a resource that differentiates between the 45 vs LP version and mono vs stereo. Pat also notes re-recordings, wrong pitch, truncated beginnings and endings, alternate takes, studio talk, warns when a song has been filtered by “Waring-fds”, has been remastered from vinyl, is a DJ 45 edit, has been remastered from the master tape, is segued to another song, etc., etc. If you want to say the book is not perfect, I’ll agree with you. But to say that it is woefully restrictive and does not detail differences is much too harsh.

Name: Bob Olivia
From: Burbank, Ca.
Time: 2000-02-12 03:50:27
Comments: Anyone know if an 80 minute CDR will actually record 80 minutes of music? I haven't been able to figure it out.

Name: Boppin' Brian
Website:
From: TigerWoodsville/BabyPanda-monium City
Time: 2000-02-12 06:25:32
Comments: Hey, seein' as there's a few compyooter noid type wonderings here, thought it'd be a chance to slip in a few of my own 2 centvos - worth ... which, as it turns out is much less than a tortilla, I'd have to say, but as for the whole enchilda on this hombre's

CD-R SCENARIO STUFF..... I had some problem, too getting up to 77, 78 minutes onto 80 minute CD-R blanks, until I read ("when all else fails..") bits & blurbs in "instructions" / "help" in program I was using where it says you have to leave a certain amount of free space at the end of music CD-R "open" for the data needed to "close" the "session" ...
What I still haven't figgered out was when using one friend's "SPIN DOCTOR" (Adaptec ..?) was why the thing slaps on a little song snippet (a second or less of each song on the end of the song that has just finished) on the ends of each song on the finished CD-R when copying from computer drive a compilation I made. The songs are converted to .wav files to drive, then the CD is burned in one "pass". This doesn't happen when CD to CD-R copies are made..

A while back someone here had cited that the better "generic" CD-R brands were found to be equal to fancy "high - end" individual "audio" CD-R brands.... They even mentioned a "site" with test data/reviews.... All I remember, unfortunately, is "Verbatim" tested "o.k"... Maybe a search of the "archives" would help... this was maybe 6 mos. ago here. I, for one have had some problems with spindle - packed 80 minute "Memorex" silver (no "label"/ "print") CD-Rs... maybe half a dozen or so in pack had aluminum flaking off or "nicked" .... "pin-holes" . This was before burning them ( entire surface developed bad case of "de-lamination"), in most cases, but often the problem devloped on outer edges of already - burned CD-R.

Sorry, no STEREO nooz this time around...! (Still waiting for alla those offers of "freebies" to pour in though...!)


Name: Tom Daly
Website: Skyline Mastering
From: Metro Boston
Time: 2000-02-12 08:32:14
Comments: With all this chatter about "quad" and the mixes used in the '70s, I'd like to point out that the quad vinyl and tape releases forced the labels to go back to the multis to remix the audio for the quad issues. This is most noticeable on RCA's quad issue of "Nilsson Schmilsson," (APD1-0319) which is not wallowing in the analog tape hiss of the stereo mix. Many of CBS's SQ releases used quad mixes that were drastically different from those on the stereo pressings, too. The SQ masters would not be appropriate for CD release because SQ used phase matrixing to place the sound on a particular channel, but the CD4 masters used by RCA and the WEA family of labels are "discrete quad," and are certainly superior to what either BMG or Time-Warner is using for today's stereo releases. It's doubtful either company has discarded it's quad masters, which could be used to provide superior sound on both stereo CD and 5.1 channel DVD-audio discs.

Name: Lex Bloom, Ahead To Stereo
From: Botson
Time: 2000-02-12 10:28:22
Comments: Mr. Daly has raised a good and valid point regarding the quad issue, and here's to sincere hope that GE/BMG and WEA did not discard the quad masters previously issued on CD4 LPs. One notable example, believe it or nuts, is The Guess Who's tune "Glamour Boy", from either "#10" (RCA APD1-0130) or "Best Of, Vol II" (RCA APD1-0269). The mass-produced stereo version contains all kinds of pitch variations which would lead the ordinary listener to believe that something was dreadfully wrong with his turntable or worse yet (ouch), his CD player. The quad version stays on pitch, the former with the rock star interview and concert sounds, the latter without. Also, quad releases of Seals & Crofts are sonically superior to their stereo counterparts. The only quadragoof is Mike Oldfield's "Tubular Bells" (Virgin QD 13-105) which fades in miserably, and sounds like Capitol's duophonic process; big mistake. Back to the drawing board, Mike.

Name: Luke Pacholski
Website: LukPac.org
From: Madison, WI
Time: 2000-02-12 11:25:29
Comments: Bob, Brian, re: I've got a spindle (50) of Memorex 80 minute blanks. I've had no problems burning - I've gone out to at least 78:30, possibly farther. As far as free space at the end - that is *after* the 80 minute mark. If you did record the free space you could actually put something like 81 or 82 minutes of music on an 80 minute blank. That's called overburning. As for what brands are best, etc - whatever works for you. Personally I've had problems both writing and reading Maxell discs, so I stay away from them. On the other side, I've *never* had a problem with Verbatim media (correction - in it's current formulation; I did have some problems with older Verbatim media). I'm about halfway through this Memorex 80 minute spindle and haven't had a problem.

Name: Luke Pacholski
Website: LukPac.org
From: Madison, WI
Time: 2000-02-12 11:25:16
Comments: Bob, Brian, re: I've got a spindle (50) of Memorex 80 minute blanks. I've had no problems burning - I've gone out to at least 78:30, possibly farther. As far as free space at the end - that is *after* the 80 minute mark. If you did record the free space you could actually put something like 81 or 82 minutes of music on an 80 minute blank. That's called overburning. As for what brands are best, etc - whatever works for you. Personally I've had problems both writing and reading Maxell discs, so I stay away from them. On the other side, I've *never* had a problem with Verbatim media (correction - in it's current formulation; I did have some problems with older Verbatim media). I'm about halfway through this Memorex 80 minute spindle and haven't had a problem.

Name: Alan
From: Phoenix
Time: 2000-02-12 12:39:01
Comments: Not all of the DTS disc are made from quad masters, the Marvin Gaye DTS disc is a new remix. I’ve haven’t seen the Police disc, but it would have to be remixed. The quad issue of "Nilsson Schmilsson," (APD1-0319) may not have the tape hiss, but it contain a really messed up mix of “Jump Into The Fire” that does not have the same musical elements as the stereo version. I’ve read books on SQ quad mastering were it was stated that both a SQ encoded 2-track and a discreet 4-channel were produced during a quad mixdown. This process may of not always used but, many of the early CBS quad 8-tracks were manufactured with either encoded SQ stereo or discreet 4-channel, a practice quickly abandoned. As I slowly convert and rediscover my quad records to CD-R, I am amazed at the hit and miss effects that engineers used to produce these mixes. Does anyone have any stories about the last NARM convention were Jack Holzman played new 5.1 remixes of Doobie Bothers and ELP?

Name: beetlefan
Time: 2000-02-12 13:42:01
Comments: Dan, if you go back to my original post about this issue, you will see that I meant that the book was inadequete in terms of the list of songs! You may have a later ediotion because my copy doesn't have so many detailed comments.

Boppin' Brian! Gimmie some skin, man! Anyway, Spin Doctor is not the best program to use for recording and burning CD's. I use CEP, CE2000 to record analog, then use CD CReator's main program for burning CD-R's. While other programs are Much more sophisticated, Creator 4 does allow one to insert custom space between songs and allows for crossfading tracks.

I just burned over 77 minutes on an 80 min. Memorex blank last night. All the 80 minute Memorex blanks work fine for me, so far. I'll let you know in a year if they're still holding up. I also live an a low humidity area, but the temperatures can get into the hundreds. The old Verbatum formula worked fine for me.

Name: Luke Pacholski
Website: LukPac.org
From: Madison, WI
Time: 2000-02-12 17:40:47
Comments: Let me clarify on the Verbatim issue. For awhile, most of the discs were being made in Singapore. They had a very dark blue reflective surface. Those worked great. The newer discs (made in Taiwan) work great as well. However, for awhile some were coming out of Japan, and those had a lighter blue recording surface. I've had people complain they couldn't read those discs. One way to tell those discs from the others is the inner ring has "CD-RECORDABLE (insert # here)-74". The "better" discs don't have any such writing. Also (as a side note), the newer blanks (first from Singapore, now Taiwan) have a more white label side (the older blanks had a silver colored top) - it seems a bit more durable to me.

Name: Luke Pacholski
Website: LukPac.org
From: Madison, WI
Time: 2000-02-12 17:40:50
Comments: Let me clarify on the Verbatim issue. For awhile, most of the discs were being made in Singapore. They had a very dark blue reflective surface. Those worked great. The newer discs (made in Taiwan) work great as well. However, for awhile some were coming out of Japan, and those had a lighter blue recording surface. I've had people complain they couldn't read those discs. One way to tell those discs from the others is the inner ring has "CD-RECORDABLE (insert # here)-74". The "better" discs don't have any such writing. Also (as a side note), the newer blanks (first from Singapore, now Taiwan) have a more white label side (the older blanks had a silver colored top) - it seems a bit more durable to me.

Name: Alain Dupont
From: Quebec (Canada)
Time: 2000-02-12 18:35:47
Comments: MONO WARNING! The Roger Miller compilation in the "20th Century Masters - Millennium Collection" series is, for no sane reason, TOTALLY IN MONO. So be warned and save your money.

Name: Bradley Olson
Website: Bradley Olson--A Person With Autism
From: Bemidji, Minnesota
Time: 2000-02-12 19:33:32
Comments: Re: Roger Miller. The reissue of "Golden Hits" is still in print and you can get the stereo versions of many of the same songs you get in mono on the boxed set and on the "20th Century Masters" collection on it. The "20th Century Masters-Millennium Collection" series is mostly for the casual fans anyway.

Name: Ken Garland
From: Los Angeles
Time: 2000-02-12 20:43:03
Comments: Henri, i too loved that movie and saw it six times the first week (i was 14) and was very glad to finally find it on cd.

Name: David R. Modny
Time: 2000-02-12 20:50:00
Comments: Hi everyone - I just picked up the Varese, Bobby Darin '66-'69 best of package and was wondering if some of the Darin experts out there (I noticed some familiar names in the liner "thank you's") could help me. Being that I'm just getting into his folk-period recordings, I'm wondering why the decision was made to do the bulk of this package in mono? Are the stereo mixes "drastically" different or inferior...or was this strictly an Inglot based "mono is better" decree. I'm not even sure of the stereo availablity on some of these tracks; but hasn't "Carpenter" been available in perfectly acceptable stereo for years (or have I not been paying close enough attention when it comes on the radio!). Any info would be much appreciated (i.e. is there a package that contains this stuff in decent quality stereo?).

Name: terryoregon
From: Beaverton, Oregon
Time: 2000-02-12 21:48:48
Comments:

I was just reading about DVD audio in my "Sound & Vision" magazine (formerly Stereo Review) and that got me to thinking. Do producers like Varese and Taragon record from master tapes at a higher sampling rate than what actually winds up on a normal CD? In other words, could music compilations be re-released on DVD audio at th